Back in 2010, Ricky Gervais appeared in the third-ever episode of Louis CKโs cult TV show Louie. His character, Dr. Ben, is an old high-school friend of Louie. When Louie turns up at his clinic because heโs feeling unwell, Dr. Ben thinks itโd be funny to tell his friend that he has AIDS. That safely out of the way, Dr. Ben then insists on a rectal examination, and at the end of the procedure, finger-bangs his friend for about three seconds until Louie shouts in protest, โThereโs no way itโs supposed to go in and out like that!โ
How charming and not-at-all-pathetic to see Gervais 12 years later, still hacking it with the same jokes in SuperNature, his new Netflix special. In the middle of a long and tedious Richard Dawkins-style late 90s atheism routine, thereโs the AIDS joke again. And another one, minutes later, involving a physician performing a surprise rectal examination. โComedy evolves, right? It changes with the timeโ, Gervais declares in the middle of a self-serving strawman routine about โwoke comedyโ. With SuperNature itโs clear that while comedy may indeed evolve, Gervais never will.
Although the showโs hook is about debunking supernatural phenomena and by extension, organised religion, thereโs very little time devoted to that theme and when Gervais does do so, the jokes are distinctly dated. Instead, SuperNatureโs first 13 minutes are devoted to two things, the first of which is Gervais making paper-thin jokes about seemingly anyone who has ever criticised him: โwoke comediansโ, newspaper columnists, internet commentators โ at one point, he reads out a real tweet making fun of him and then tells the audience why the tweet is rubbish.
The second thing, inevitably, is transphobic jokes. Within SuperNature, you will find a great many jokes involving trans women, some depicting them as predators and potential rapists, others exhorting them to โlose the cockโ. None of them are funny, all of them are harmful and dangerous and absolutely contribute towards the frightening frequency of violence directed against trans people (most recently, the school shooting at Uvalde, Texas was falsely blamed on a trans woman by certain journalists and a Republican politician, leading to a trans teenager being assaulted elsewhere in Texas).
Unlike Dave Chappelle, Ricky Gervais doesnโt actually claim to question trans rights, careful to remind us that heโs just kidding. โTrans rights are human rightsโ, he says much later in the show. But this is arguably worse and involves an even more cynical bent of mind.
The overwhelming feeling I have about routines like these is not outrage; itโs tedium.
Gervais at once declares his one-percenter status (โI am a white heterosexual multimillionaireโ) and also keeps depicting himself as a simple, salt-of-the-earth bloke whoโs being unfairly targeted by uppity, woke mobs. Like the time he launches into a rant about โpunching downโ in comedy, where he employs the classic Trumpian move of depicting oneโs (unspecified) critics to be out-of-touch university educated elite, whoโre snobbish and petty and jealous of a โman-of-the-peopleโ rising to prominence and power.
He says: โThereโs Oxbridge comedians writing for the posh papers, the rules of comedy, theyโre laying it down, laying down the law. And itโs all stuff like, โComedy should punch up. You should never punch down.โ Sometimes, youโve got to punch down. Like when youโre fighting a disabled toddler. If you donโt punch down, the little cunt will win!โ
The overwhelming feeling I have about routines like these is not outrage; itโs tedium. In most people, this strain of sophomoric humourโthe standup equivalent of โblooper videosโ involving people getting hit in the nutsโdies a natural death while theyโre still fairly young. Unless of course, Netflix is paying you 40 million dollars specifically to stick to this mind-numbingly dull formula, designed to feed the culture wars. When Gervais is announced on the stage at the beginning of the special, weโre told that heโs someone โwho doesnโt need to do thisโ. Gervais then spends the next hour showing us just how true this was.
Is there anything redeeming about SuperNature? A couple of things, perhaps, if you squint. Gervais is serviceable when heโs talking about British idiosyncrasies. Heโs also funny when he talks about ageing and the inevitable decaying of our bodies. The latter is in line with his fine work on the Netflix dramedy After Life. But for much of SuperNatureโs hour-long runtime, Gervais is deeply unfunny and relies on tropes and templates that wouldโve come across as hackneyed even a decade ago. My advice: skip it, unless youโre a diehard fan or just deeply committed to being annoying on the internet.
comments
comments for this post are closed